news & events

08 March 2010
The Sydney Morning Herald

Attempt to block 'Mummy D' fails

By Joel Gibson



A woman has failed in her bid to have the Family Court stop her former partner from encouraging their six-year-old daughter to call her stepmother "Mummy D".

The mother applied for the unusual order in a South Australian case, years after the parents separated within the first year of the child's life.

She said encouraging the term of endearment was "an incendiary action" by her former partner and his new partner, even though it was followed by the initial of the stepmother's first name and they had agreed not to encourage the simple use of "mum" or "mummy".

But Justice Christine Dawe refused to grant the order, saying it was impractical to require the father to stop encouraging the stepmother and the child to use the term ''Mummy D'', and could have led to further litigation.

"Weighing all of the factors up, and particularly that the child has in the past used the expression 'Mummy [D]', and on the basis that I am not satisfied from any of the material before the court that the use of the expression 'Mummy [D]' by the stepmother would undermine the mother's relationship with the child, I am not satisfied that it is in the best interests of the child [to grant the order]," the judge said.

"I also accept that, at her age, she will develop and in future will be likely to, or may well possibly, adapt to calling each of her step-parents by their first names rather than using expressions of either 'Mummy' or 'Daddy'."

The judge said that details of names used are usually agreed outside the court, but "in this case, it has not been possible".

Professor Patrick Parkinson, a family law expert from the University of Sydney, said it was the first such case he had heard of, but was similar to frequent disputes over whether a child's surname could be changed.

"There are limits to what any court can do. You can't regulate every aspect of family life through court orders," he said. "We've got to grow up and stop thinking every breakdown can be resolved by the court."

The case had probably cost the parties a lot of money, time and anxiety, but there was not much that could be done to stop such changes occurring after divorce except to respect the other people involved and recognise their role in a child's life, he said.


TOP BACK NEWS & EVENTS
Donations will gladly be received and appreciated.
Every $ you give goes towards saving lives, please if you can give what you can.
Tony Miller Founder Dads in Distress

Welcome to Dads in Distress -  Introduction -  News & Events -  Update Info -  Aims -  Objectives -  Information -  Meetings -  Contact Us -  Stories -  Help Us -  Links -  Downloads -  Print Version -  Newsletter -  Forum -  Meeting Point -  Tony's Diary -  Donations -  Volunteers -  Books -  Online Shop -  Search -  Disclaimer -  webdesign by Gabriele Fink © 2006


Dads In Distress is funded by the Australian Federal Government.


Top News
Welcome
Introduction
News & Events
Update Info
Aims
Objectives
Information
Meetings
Contact Us
Stories
Help Us
Links
Downloads
Print Version
Newsletter
Forum
Meeting Point
Tonys Diary
Donations
Volunteers
Books
Online Shop
Search